Greenfield vs. Overall, the biggest advantage of SAP BRFplus is the separation of business rules from the rest of the logic and other code. With an SAP S/4HANA brownfield conversion, the ERP system can initially be converted in the course of a technical upgrade, allowing proven custom processes and structures to be retained in an innovative environment. brownfield data center development, factors such as power, cooling, location and layout can make or break a project. However, this option is only available to customers currently running SAP ECC 6. The brownfield deployments may face a. Each approach offers distinct. Selective Data Transition (Bluefield): Empty Shell Creation, Conversion and Data Migration. The Greenfield approach lets organizations predefine migration objects and best practices available in the new platform. A Guide on S/4HANA Approaches. Greenfield e Brownfield são muito utilizados para explicar opções no mercado de investimentos fora do país (FDI) ou mesmo em expansões. brownfield ramifications. Como se mencionó anteriormente, las inversiones nuevas y de remodelación son dos tipos de inversión extranjera directa. It doesn’t rock the boat and it’s easy enough to execute. An SAP Brownfield system conversion refers to a technical conversion from an existing SAP ECC system to a new SAP S/4HANA system. brownfield-Organisations must choose whether to pursue a “greenfield” or a “brownfield” implementation and evaluate the pros and cons for each. Read on to learn the relevance of greenfield vs. A related use of greenfield/brownfield occurs in the name of a US law: the "Brownfields law", signed by George W Bush in 2002, which limits liability for cleanup of "brownfield" sites for new owners. 0) must also be carried out in advance of the changeover: SAP Netweaver 7. The first one is to purchase a brownfield site that’s closer to the city centre and infrastructure but has the potential to cause important environmental issues. Every client is different, with landscapes. SAPの世界における言葉の使い方については、SAP社のBlogでわかりやすい記事がありましたので、そちらをベースに、弊社のほうで補足しながらこの後解説していきます。 Considering greenfield vs brownfield implementation, it is essential to know their main distinctions. SAP has delivered the solution as standard since the SAP S/4HANA On Premise 1909 release and since the SAP S/4HANA Cloud 1908 release. For many organizations, migrating to the SAP S/4HANA platform is a critical step in their digital transformation journey. This approach is alsoBrownfield project vs greenfield project. Fit and Gap analysis help identify the gaps and. Greenfield migration enables enterprises to build scalable applications from scratch, while brownfield migration may be limited by the scalability of the legacy systems. August 9, 2023 . When it comes to SAP S/4HANA implementations and migrations, plenty of terminologies is flying around. As an SAP Gold Partner, we use industry best practices for delivering successful S/4 implementation and. Brownfield approach – Your quick and cost-efficient conversion to SAP S/4HANA. In a Greenfield project, a brand new software application is developed, where new architecture, platform and other technologies are chosen. Setup in brownfield. Für die Migration der SAP-Systeme und Azure gibt es grundsätzlich drei Ansätze: Greenfield, Brownfield und Bluefield/Orangefield als Mischform. Greenfield and brownfield projects are two types of real estate development projects that differ in terms of the land they are built on and the approach to development. Choosing a greenfield vs. Our consultancy services are designed to help businesses make informed decisions and successfully implement their chosen approach. Vice President SAP Delivery Norb is an innovative and effective Senior Information Technology and Program Management Executive. Greenfield, Brownfield & Bluefield Implementation Approach for SAP S4 HANA. Billed as "business transformation as a service," Rise with SAP is a bundle of products and services SAP offers to get customers quickly up and running on S/4HANA Cloud and its broader ecosystem, which includes. Brown field investment, also referred to as "brownfield" is when a company or government entity purchases or leases existing production facilities to launch a new production activity. Brownfield, Greenfield and Bluefield are the three main approaches for moving to SAP S/4HANA. 0), however organizations that are already on SAP can also choose this route. If central tax reporting is activated, local advance sales tax returns or recapitulative statements can also. Choosing the Right Sap S/4hana Migration Approach: Greenfield Vs. Pero ahí es principalmente donde terminan las. This simple framework to help you as starter to decide approach on move to S/4HANA #MoveToCloudNow, #MoveToIntelligentEnterpriseNow #. Although it does have its complexities, it is the simplest approach, and quite possibly the quickest. In previous blogs, we discussed what Greenfield and. Most SAP customers moving from SAP ERP Central Component (ECC) to S/4HANA actually need to do two migrations: They'll need to migrate to a new database, and they'll need to migrate. I need help on below question. (+) When using Referenced Data Source Approach (RDS) Greenfield implementation. Belgium en fr Brazil pt China zh en. In contrast to the brownfield approach, the greenfield approach is dependent on creating a clean, new concept. Makes a lot of sense at least. One option is to use a priority weight for each criteria in order of importance. RICEFW in SAP is produced during the Explore phase of the SAP Activate methodology – a process designed by SAP to implement SAP products, such as SAP S/4 HANA. mas não é caso). “We make a perfect copy of a customer’s existing system and remove their data from it, keeping the configurations and custom development efforts, and migrate it to. Thanks, AJ. 200 employees at work. A5E Consulting: Empowering Your Business with SAP S/4HANA Private Cloud vs. A hybrid approach combines elements of greenfield and brownfield SAP S/4HANA implementations for specific reasons. SAP Brownfield: Which is the better approach? Which approach is best suited for a migration to SAP S/4HANA and which path companies choose depends on numerous factors. A hybrid strategy blends features of both Greenfield and Brownfield SAP S/4 HANA processes. In the brownfield option, the task may be adding a new management module to the current CMS, integrating new features to an e-store or boosting the performance of an. In 2019, as in 2018, no clear trend of a. S/4 Brownfield vs Greenfield . -----. During a brownfield investment, you will purchase or lease an existing site and redevelop it. A greenfield project, or greenfield software development, describes a brand-new project developed from scratch. . is an in-memory, column-oriented, relational database management system developed and marketed by SAP SE. How should your SAP strategy evolve in line with SAP’s evolution? By: Brian McKenna. Brownfield land (image on the top) is an area of land that has been used for commercial or industrial purposes. SAP Enterprise Support Academy has provisioned a conversion model for companies who choose to modernize their IT landscape, while still keeping the original nuts and bolts of their machine in place. The Brownfield Approach – System Conversion. 0 or ECC 6. Hi Everyone, I need help on below. However, if you had a lot of technical debt in your system, a greenfield migration would be the more feasible option that would reward you with a clean and. SAP customers has to make their mind either to go for Green field or Brown filed approach for S4 HANA migration 2) Whether Green field or Brown field has influence whether the customer is going to opt for On-premise or On-cloud environment, because if. Sr. A greenfield project, or greenfield software development, describes a brand-new project developed from scratch. A short guide to primary SAP S/4HANA modules and LOBsSteps for SAP Archiving Configuration. Once you have defined the business need and built a business case, you can select the best approach, develop a strategy, create your roadmap and make it happen. Der Greenfield-Ansatz beinhaltet die Installation und Konfiguration eines brandneuen Netzwerks. Brownfield vs. Greenfield and brownfield are the two prominent alternatives for transitioning to SAP S/4HANA. Yet a move to S/4HANA can seem overwhelming, as worries of ecosystem complexity force SAP customers to consider the greenfield vs. Brownfield project development is more sustainable, as it reduces the pressure on greenfield sites. greenfield issue -- or a third option known as a hybrid migration. Another name for RICEFW is WRICEF in SAP. SAP S/4HANA delivers massive simplifications (customer adoption, data model, user experience, decision making, business processes. A greenfield SAP implementation is typically a part of a large-scale business transformation project that includes new installations of SAP Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) applications. SAP customers considering an S/4HANA move should not underestimate the number of technical and business decisions they. Brownfield Deployment. Alternatively, a greenfield investment involves buying a site on which you will need to construct a building. Right click and copy the link to. A quick search on SAP greenfield vs brownfield will give. A brownfield SAP S/4HANA implementation, on the other hand, always starts with an existing system, with only a few key parts modified. A Brownfield. Greenfield vs Brownfield implementation in SAP. A greenfield project can describe any project that a team starts from scratch. This is the fastest and technically easiest option to convert any SAP ECC 6. the cornerstone is a well-planned and implemented . To define it without going into too much detail; Greenfield projects are projects where a project is made from scratch in a new environment without any restrictions. The preparations for a brownfield migration are similar to those for a greenfield implementation. Netweaver is a platform (or architecture) for SAP's business applications and is programmed in the SAP programming language ABAP. Brownfield. brownfield is a long-debated business philosophy, and it’s critical for businesses to weigh both approaches as they begin SAP S/4HANA migration. 15,000 users in application management. The transition to SAP S/4HANA – avoid the lift and shift. Are you ready to implement SAP S/4HANA or too worried about disrupting your day-to-day business processes? According to the SAPinsider survey report, SAP S/4HANA: State of the Market, “31% of companies overall are planning a ‘lift and shift. 9/5 - this is how our customers rate us on Google on average. Thus, Brownfield is a Migration Process. SAP greenfield vs. Hybrid: make much-needed changes but keep your data. Springfield vs. The appeal of brownfield is in its simplicity: it moves the entire existing SAP ECC system to SAP S/4HANA. 9/5 - this is how our customers rate us on Google on average. Brownfield sites are often viewed as higher risk (and therefore higher cost) because of their history. g. The greenfield approach would automatically. 5+ years of experience in Devops. SAP S/4HANA Adoption Option 1 – Greenfield (New Implementation) 1; SAP S/4HANA Adoption. • Reviewed operational processes to support definition of best migration strategy for SAP S/4Hana upgrade of a major retail company; roadmap and key actions defined in 4 months (Greenfield vs. Desde el lanzamiento de SAP S/4 HANA y el deseo de las empresas de actualizarse a esta última versión, comenzó una batalla entre dos enfoques de migración: greenfield vs. Find the. Then we plan the project in detail. As a starting point, companies typically take industry best practice standards, including SAP Model Company templates where available. Greenfield vs Brownfield. 1. In this article I’ll focus on the “how. The conversion is divided into two phases: the preparation. Which one to choose depends on factors like these: how complex the existing IT infrastructure and how extensive the existing, individual interventions in the SAP core are, what needs the company has for the new ERP solution in terms of optimising. Brownfield: keep the same structure, improve performance. Greenfield: A "Greenfield" or "Vanilla" implementation is the traditional way of implementing a SAP system. Brownfield or Greenfield? When it comes to the main SAP S/4HANA migration approaches, there are two of them: Brownfield and Greenfield. Business Trends Event Information Personal Insights Product Information. Differentiation: SAP C/4HANA vs. For example, a new BW/4HANA system or SAP BW powered by HANA system where you would be building all data models from scratch and also have the opportunity to rethink and optimize “old” data flows. No compulsion to work within the constraints of existing systems or infrastructure. Previously, the solution was called "Digital Platform". When deciding between SAP Greenfield vs Brownfield , there are several factors to consider, including budget, timeline, business goals, and IT infrastructure. Conversion to S/4HANA or Brownfield: This approach reuses existing processes with minimum disruption to the business. One of the most discussed issues related to SAP S/4HANA migrations is the brownfield vs. Here you can find all the information about which Model Companies are available and what advantages they offer. For example: One of my client is using SAP ECC 6. As long as the legacy system, e. Here's an explanation of the key differences between SAP greenfield vs. Also the quiz to decide Greenfield vs Brownfield is quite helpful. Contrary to Brownfield, a Greenfield implementation restarts your organization's PMO journey from scratch with a completely new systems approach with no battle scars of inefficient processes and no worries about convoluted data baggage of the past. It is an overachieving set of guidelines used by the project team in making decisions and taking action in alignment with business operational strategies. This approach is alsoThe technology is mature and has been used over almost two decades in M&A related projects and SAP system conversions. Find out the difference between SAP S4 HANA Greenfield implementation vs Brownfield implementation in this videoBrownfield Greenfield Technical conversion of the existing system Setup of new SAP S/4HANA system ECC S/4HANA Any DBHANA ECC S/4HANA HANA Data migration IBM IMPACT Industry Solutions IBM SAP S/4HANA MIGRATION FACTORY How do goals influence the migration approach? The typical trade-off: Easy but limited vs. The Hybrid migration process is easier because it. brownfield implementation may require more investment, but it can provide more significant long-term benefits, such as increased efficiency and improved business. Blogs tagged SAP S/4 HANA Greenfield Implementation. If you had a streamlined system in terms of code, data and integration or could get to one without too much pain, a brownfield transition to S/4HANA would be the recommended option. 3. Businesses today must constantly look for innovative solutions to increase operational efficiencies and remain competitive in an ever-evolving digital environment. # green field projects in India # Greenfield and Brownfield Projects in India # greenfield factory project plan # Greenfield Plant Setup in India # greenfield vs brownfield deployment # greenfield vs brownfield vs Bluefield vs greyfield # Setup Greenfield Factory. Hybrid migration approach (which is a combination of greenfield and brownfield approaches) As per an SAP Insider report, most organizations opt for brownfield migration since it is the least disruptive and preserves their current system and configurations. Compare SAP greenfield vs. The meaning is similar across domains: greenfield. With greenfield migration, enterprises can leverage the cloud to easily scale their infrastructure up or down, while with brownfield migration, the legacy systems may need. Technically, both migration scenarios are usually technically possible, as well as corresponding middle ways such as Bluefield (selective migration), which are. Phase 1. Eine Greenfield-Implementierung bietet die Möglichkeit, eine vollständig neue IT-Landschaft aufzubauen und die Vorteile von SAP S/4HANA vollständig zu nutzen. A quick search on SAP greenfield vs brownfield will give you dozens of results with blogs, articles, videos and even people who have coined the term “bluefield”. Looking for a path to SAP S/4HANA? Learn the pros and cons of greenfield, brownfield, hybrid and BLUEFIELD™ from delaware expert Folker Lamote. greenfield model. brownfield. For different FIORI deployment approach check this link. Improper dual landscape. Those who rely on Greenfield are looking for more flexibility, a higher degree of innovation, higher data quality and fast, lean. 0 and upgrading to 2. SAP Ariba is a cloud-based platform for purchasing and procurement. The key is for developers to understand the differences in service approaches. brownfield approach for S/4HANA. 0 is co-deployed in the same client, we will not be able to use the SAP Software Update Manager. Put simply these are bits of functionality that exist in SAP ECC but do not. It’s a thorough and simple lift and shift that preserves the structure you already have in place. Brownfield. SAP's Hybris, which began as a flexible e-commerce platform, has evolved to include CRM and marketing automation functions. Innovative. This paper describes our experience of developing a new system (Greenfield development) after continuously extending an existing one (Brownfield development) for a long time. Brownfield und Greenfield sind Ansätze für die Migration der SAP-Landschaft auf SAP S/4HANA. . Write a Blog Post Close; Categories. Hybrid SAP S/4 Hana Migration Strategy. brownfield projects. without a separate data extraction (ETL process). Categories. this can be thought as upgrading or adding new components based on the existing. The closer you are to the brownfield end of the continuum, the easier it is to extract, transform and load historical data as part of the migration. brownfield ramifications. Adjustment of the objects and custom code to SAP HANA and SAP S/4HANA. This is your brownfield implementation to SAP Business Suite 4 SAP HANA (SAP S/4HANA), and when the conversion is complete, you’re going to drive down the streets in your new ride! And when that green traffic light turns yellow, you’re going to make the light, before it turns red. Greenfield is a new implementation project, while brownfield aims to convert the current ERP system landscape to SAP S/4HANA. Greenfield vs Brownfield? Starting with a brand-new SAP S/4HANA system, using the greenfield approach may suit some organizations. Greenfield SAP implementations on Amazon Web Services (AWS) differ from SAP on AWS migrations, because there is no existing server footprint on premises or. To go greenfield or brownfield-- that is the big question for SAP customer companies. A brownfield application is an existing application, while a greenfield application is one that is not yet made or is in very early stages of development. This LOB includes SAP's Sales and Distribution module. Setup in greenfield projects (aka SAP S/4HANA new implementations) Big bang approach: When all applicable tiers are delivered at the same time (e. If you want to migrate to SAP S/4HANA on Premise you do have the following three options: System Conversion (aka “Brownfield-Approach”) New Implementation (aka “Greenfield-Approach”) Selective Data Transition to SAP S/4HANA. A perfect copy of a customer’s existing system will be made while removing their data from it, keeping the configurations and custom development efforts, and migrate it to SAP S/4HANA. Smart Greenfield - Mix & Match. The SAP standard and SAP best practices. That simplicity is also its downside, though. When you need to resolve a brownfield deployment scenario, consider your existing Microsoft Azure environment as the place to start. When considering greenfield vs. When deciding between SAP Greenfield vs Brownfield , there are several factors to consider, including budget, timeline, business goals, and IT infrastructure. A hybrid strategy blends features of both Greenfield and Brownfield SAP S/4 HANA processes. By: David Essex. The Greenfield approach lets organizations predefine migration objects and best practices available in the new platform. The second one is to pick a greenfield site that is much cleaner than the brownfield one but is located further from the centre. It doesn’t rock the boat and it’s easy enough to execute. Understand greenfield vs. And this is how. Bluefield. At Applexus, we believe this is an oversimplification of how you need to think through your SAP S/4HANA digital transformation journey. The selected processes are based on the SAP best practice standard. The approach is. Greenfield vs. It is also imperative to follow the testing scenarios carefully, from unit and integration testing to system performance testing. This meticulous approach supports a gradual transformation, letting day-to-day operations glide along with minimal hiccups. Pros and Cons Comparison of each approach Next Steps Before New Implementation (Greenfield) vs System Conversion (Brownfield) SAP has long been. ICMR stands for Intercompany Matching and Reconciliation. The Greenfield, Brownfield, and Bluefield, (also known as selective data transition) these are the terms used when somebody wants to implement S/4HANA, and particularly when they’re transforming from SAP ECC footprint. Greenfield vs. Typically, the deployment and planning of a Greenfield . Find out more about the transition to SAP S/4HANA and how to avoid the lift and shift. The abbreviation SAP S/4HANA stands for SAP Business Suite 4 SAP HANA. CRM and the Customer Service module also play a key role for businesses where post-sales service is important. “It has to hit the same price point as a classical sort of deployment. An embedded ABAP environment offers values for both greenfield and brownfield projects. cut-over from the old system to the new one. This approach allows you to implement a true upgrade or conversion of your system. Brownfield vs. It is a migration strategy that appears promising under certain conditions. Greenfield, Brownfield, and Bluefield approaches are adopted by companies that want to shift to SAP S/4HANA. maio 15, 2023. 1. Greenfield vs. Deployment of a Greenfield project. The Greenfield strategy is the way for everyone who wants to exploit the full potential of SAP S/4HANA and increase data quality. The first one is. brownfield approach: Which to use for S/4HANA; How to modernize your. Accenture’s implementation took six months and set the foundation for the SAP S/4HANA upgrade to. The report also reveals that most organizations are still undecided when they want to. SAP is currently - by revenue - the largest European software company and the third largest software company in the world. Today, I sit down with Director of Global SAP Practice and Senior SAP Solutions Architect at D4M International Raj Krish. The decision to implement SAP S/4HANA, SAP’s flagship intelligent ERP system, is a significant step for any organization. Top ways to strengthen protection for IoT devices in OT. 棕地开发通常发生在您想要开发或改进现有应用程序时，并迫使您使用以前创建的代码。. 3. g. Since it's a move to the public cloud, an SAP S/4HANA Cloud implementation differs from on-premises installation in a few ways, such as the levels of customization. 0 and not BW/HANA 2. Reference this overview about productive sizing, including re. This is especially important as keeping up with the rapidly changing portfolio and developments from SAP (regular product names changes, variants of products, evolution of key messages etc. Summary. This is one. However, once you have made this decision in favor. Greenfield vs. the migration of data without major process-related, functional and organisational changes?. Greenfield approach: Squeaky clean S/4HANA authorizations vs. Brownfield. First I will recap shortly the brownfield and greenfield approach to motivate the need for. This is a vast improvement to the greenfield model, where OEMs rely on the replacement cycle to sell IoT technology as part of their. The greenfield approach, on the other hand, usually takes longer. 2. The Simplification List provides detailed information at the application level about exactly where the differences between the two suites lie - i. Nowadays most projects are now described as brownfield or greenfield. Brownfield implementations. The image below outlines the stages of an SAP S/4HANA conversion: 7 steps to prepare and execute your SAP S/4HANA Brownfield Migration. July 12, 2023 . Most SAP customers moving from SAP ERP Central Component (ECC) to S/4HANA actually need to do two migrations: They'll need to migrate to a new database, and they'll need to migrate. Process reviews and recommendations for changes: L1, L2, and L3 process documentation of the SAP use with S/4HANA; RFP documentation for S/4HANA scope and requirements; S/4HANA project implementation approach and roadmap (Greenfield, BLUEFIELD™ vs Brownfield) including data migration complexity views; S/4HANA. This blog describes the options and aims to help you determine which is right based on your. Source: SAP. Both approaches can concern many types of IT projects, such as a software tool, an app, a website, a network, or an IT facility. 15,000 users in application management. comFollow usLinked In: vs. 200 employees at work. 338. Selecting the Right Migration Approach: Greenfield vs. 0 (or earlier versions) to SAP Global Trade Services, edition for SAP HANA, the question of implementation approach often pops up. SAP Enterprise Support Academy has provisioned a conversion model for companies who choose to modernize their IT landscape, while still keeping the original nuts and bolts of their machine in place. Brownfield, Greenfield und Bluefield sind die Bezeichnungen methodischer Ansätze, mit denen sich Handelsunternehmen in ihrem Geschäftsalltag bislang nicht befassen mussten. Some of the greatest advantages of Greenfield Software Development include: Gives an opportunity to implement a state-of-the-art technology solution from scratch. Brownfield, Greenfield, or Selective Data Migration? When preparing for your transition from SAP GTS 11. Brownfield projects are normally associated with urban areas. Brownfield Implementation: The brownfield approach is a popular method for upgrading existing SAP S/4HANA systems that have been in use for at least a year. Greenfield or brownfield implementations are two strategies available for implementing SAP S/4HANA. . A role is played by: The current conversion efforts and time plans in the SAP S/4HANA implementation for the ERP processes. Such differences can vary according to the site you are. This blog describes the options and aims to help you determine which is right based on your situation and goals. SAP S/4HANA migration: A definitive guide. “Think of a car,” says Folker. Hi all,. Making much-needed changes but keeping your data. In contrast, a brownfield implementation of SAP S/4HANA always begins with the existing system – it’s just that some important elements are changed. Contacts. But, the term greenfield vs brownfield is not only related to oil & gas industries but is widely used in many industries like IT, Construction, Manufacturing, Building Services, etc. However, depending on the type of sites (brownfield or greenfield) the project management approach varies. Find out more about the transition to SAP S/4HANA and how to avoid the lift and shift. Technical foundation: Move to SAP Business Suite on HANA. Discover SAP S/4HANA. One option is to use a priority weight for each criteria in order of importance. Select Install a new SAP S/4HANA. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator has support for some well known proprietary systems like SAP. Brownfield vs. Alien vs. 1. By. In contrast, a brownfield implementation of SAP S/4HANA always begins with the existing system – it’s just that some important elements are changed. As businesses continue to evolve, they must adopt new technologies and systems to stay competitive. In addition to the question of which project approach to choose (greenfield vs. Compare Greenfield vs. Two common strategies for the. The SAP Activate Methodology is designed to guide SAP customers to work through complex SAP implementation projects and conversions with ease and greater success. brownfield implementation. Message. SAP Greenfield vs. In addition to various strategic tools, the solution has a function as a B2B marketplace where companies and their suppliers can collaborate and transact virtually. x system, running on any database, to SAP S/4HANA. Here's an explanation of the key differences between SAP greenfield vs. Brownfield transformation is a holistic approach to decarbonizing legacy coal, oil and gas-fired power plants combined with the use of existing assets and infrastructure. They chose to use Panaya for both their ECC upgrades as well as for ongoing testing and non-SAP projects, like testing a new program for managing the company’s keg business and a POS system upgrade. #greenfield #brownfield #s4hana #sapcommunity #sap. Provides a clean slate for software development. Brownfield land is developed land. It is precisely this additional effort that is the advantage. Think disused factories, outmoded office buildings, or any location that was once a work site. So, before you go down the greenfield path, be sure you’re ready for an intense and involved re-engineering process. greenfield issue -- or a third option known as a hybrid migration. , which transactions are still available in SAP S/4HANA or not. To find out where the differences lie and the advantages and disadvantages of the respective strategies, read here. ) can be a challenge. The brownfield approach (system conversion) is the second and the more popular option. Here's an explanation of the key differences between SAP greenfield vs. Digital Core Platform is the first step. Alternatively, in a Mix & Match approach, a new Greenfield-like S/4HANA system is created and a selected amount of legacy custom development (normally <30%) is carried over. Implementing SAP S/4HANA, the next-generation business suite, is a significant decision for any organization. Short-termism? Based on our experience, this is what you need to know: Before New Implementation (Greenfield) vs System Conversion (Brownfield) SAP has long been an undisputed market leader in the ERP space. Shelbyville. Brownfield. Raj: Greenfield basically means that it’s a brand-new implementation of S/4HANA and usually it is done when. Greenfield: Building a completely new installation of SAP S/4HANA, essentially starting from scratch and defining a wholly new operating model. The first one is to purchase a brownfield site that’s closer to the city centre and infrastructure but has the potential to cause important environmental issues. Greenfield and Brownfield investments are two types of foreign direct investment. If you have an SAP system running that you want to extend with new functionality (delta sizing: brownfield and greenfield approach) and/or add new users (re-sizing) or migrate to SAP HANA perform brownfield sizing. brownfield), it is also important to note that a decision to migrate to SAP S/4HANA must be made individually. By. However, depending on the type of sites (brownfield or greenfield) the project management approach varies. Brownfield: the (multi) million-dollar question. e. A hybrid implementation is a combination of both greenfield and brownfield approaches. At Melasoft, we understand that organizations embarking on an SAP S/4HANA transformation journey need expert guidance and support to navigate the complexities of the Greenfield, Brownfield, and Bluefield approaches.